Skip to content

Disappointed Developers of Eliminated Apps Urge Apple to Show Committment to Competitiveness within the App Store

Recently, Apple has either eliminated or imposed limitations on various applications aimed at controlling screen usage, within its App Store. According to current reports from The New York Times, this number includes a total of 17 apps.

Disappointed Developers of Eliminated Apps Urge Apple to Show Committment to Competitiveness within the App Store

Last month, Apple took into account some screen time limiting apps and imposed restrictions or outright removal from the App Store. Currently, 17 affected developers have proposed for Apple to create an API, allowing them to return to the App Store without violating Apple's strict privacy guidelines. The proposed API would enable third-party developers to use Apple's technology for monitoring screen time without exposing any app data, the developers claim.

Following Apple's removal, the developers argue that since Apple developed its Screen Time feature, Apple has the means to share its technology, avoiding workarounds that breach the tech giant's privacy stipulations. The stumbling block here is whether Apple will embrace this developer proposal.

Apple has not yet addressed this matter publicly. The company claimed these third-party apps utilized a highly invasive technology known as Mobile Device Management (MDM) to gain access and control over devices and users' sensitive information such as location, app use, email accounts, camera permissions, and browsing history. This resulted in Apple removing or restricting more than 24 screen time and parental control apps in total.

Developers now believe that Apple holds the keys to an amicable solution. Unlike the past, where developers used workarounds to bypass Apple's privacy regulations, an API solution could automatically meet Apple's guidelines. But, for the API idea to come to fruition, Apple has to be invested. While developers have outlined their proposal, it's ultimately up to Apple to release such an API.

Apple's recent clash with the Supreme Court over its 'monopolistic' App Store policies is creating some unease. In response, Apple published a page this week, defending its strict curation as essential for delivering a secure, private, and high-quality user experience. Apple reviewed over 100,000 apps per week and rejected 40% due to minor bugs and privacy concerns.

While many users appreciate the security offered by the App Store, some are incensed they can't sideload applications or download from third-parties. This frustration also impacts Apple's competitors such as Spotify, which recently filed an antitrust suit against Apple, accusing Apple of using its strict guidelines to provide exclusive advantages to Apple Music. Spotify isn't the only one basing its complaints on Apple's guidelines flexibility – several app developers and competitors murmur similar sentiments.

Whether Apple will develop an API for these screen time apps remains to be seen. This topic will most likely surface during Apple's upcoming WWDC annual developer conference on Monday. Whether Apple embraces this proposal will impact not only the affected developers but also the App Store performance as a whole.

  1. The developers believe that Apple, with its existing Screen Time feature, has the necessary technology to create an API, thus avoiding the use of invasive Mobile Device Management (MDM) apps.
  2. If Apple decides to develop and release the proposed API, it could help third-party developers comply with Apple's privacy guidelines without resorting to minimal workarounds.
  3. The upcoming WWDC annual developer conference on Monday will be a significant platform for Apple to express its stance on the developers' proposal and potentially announce any future plans regarding screen time limiting apps.
  4. Regardless of Apple's decision, the future of the App Store and its relationship with developers and competitors, such as Spotify, will be significantly impacted by the tech giant's response to the proposal for an API.

Read also:

    Latest