Skip to content

Russian Shadow Fleet Tanker Crew Accused of Deliberately Damaging Undersea Communication Cables - Finnish Authorities Assert that the Ship dragged its anchor for 56 miles on the seabed, inflicting $70 million worth of damage to five communication cables.

Oil tanker crew indicted for 'severe sabotage and disruption of telecommunications' by the Finnish government.

Russian Shadow Fleet Tanker Crew Accused of Deliberately Damaging Undersea Cables - Finnish...
Russian Shadow Fleet Tanker Crew Accused of Deliberately Damaging Undersea Cables - Finnish Authorities Allege vessel dragged anchor for 56 miles on the ocean floor, resulting in approximately $70 million worth of damage to five cables.

Russian Shadow Fleet Tanker Crew Accused of Deliberately Damaging Undersea Communication Cables - Finnish Authorities Assert that the Ship dragged its anchor for 56 miles on the seabed, inflicting $70 million worth of damage to five communication cables.

In the heart of the Baltic Sea, a legal drama is unfolding as the crew members of the Eagle S oil tanker face charges for allegedly damaging undersea cables connecting Finland and Estonia on Christmas Day 2024. The vessel is suspected of being part of Russia's "shadow fleet," a designation for vessels sailing under foreign flags to evade sanctions.

The Finnish National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) has pointed the finger at the Eagle S, accusing it of severing the Estlink 2 power cable and several other internet and communications cables. The charges include aggravated sabotage and aggravated telecommunications interference. The captain, first officer, and second officer are the individuals facing these charges.

The crew denies any intentional misconduct, arguing that severe weather conditions contributed to the incident. They also contend that Finland lacks jurisdiction since the events occurred outside Finnish territorial waters. However, Finnish prosecutors argue that the effects of the crime materialized in Finland, placing it under Finnish jurisdiction.

Investigators found evidence of "almost a hundred kilometers" of anchor dragging on a path followed by the Eagle S in the Baltic. This incident caused significant damage, with two Finnish companies spending €60m (USD$70m) to repair the damaged undersea cables.

The trial is set to begin at the Helsinki District Court, with the prosecution alleging that the actions were deliberate. The crew has been denied permission to leave Finland pending the outcome of the trial. The case is expected to raise a debate about Finland's jurisdiction outside its territorial waters.

The suspected Russian 'Hybrid warfare' in the Baltic Sea has been a topic of concern for European politicians. This form of warfare involves intentional damage to undersea cables, as demonstrated by the Eagle S's actions. The Eagle S was seized by Finnish border guards and a police contingency on December 26, 2024.

The Eagle S has been subject to various sanctions from different countries, including the EU, UK, Switzerland, and Canada, for its involvement in transporting Russian oil products. Late last year, the Eagle S was also suspected of being behind high-profile internet cable sabotage in the Baltic Sea.

Finland's geographic position, sharing a long border with Russia and relying heavily on undersea cabling for connections with Sweden, Estonia, and Central European nations, makes the suspected Russian 'Hybrid warfare' a particularly sensitive issue. Lawyers for the accused have already highlighted the legal wrinkle of jurisdiction, adding an intriguing twist to this ongoing legal saga.

  1. The ongoing legal drama involving the Eagle S oil tanker, accused of damaging undersea cables in the Baltic Sea, is a complex issue that intertwines technology, politics, and general-news, as it raises questions about jurisdiction, hybrid warfare tactics, and international sanctions.
  2. The Eagle S case, which is set to unfold at the Helsinki District Court, not only implicates the crew members for alleged crimes like aggravated sabotage and telecommunications interference, but it also casts a wide net over international politics and technology, with implications for Europe's infrastructure, crime-and-justice, and geopolitical relations.

Read also:

    Latest